We discovered several patterns of innovation that occur frequently in the search for new business models. Each pattern highlights a different route on the solution canvas and represents a systematic way in which organizations try to tackle innovation.
We typically visualize this journey as a linear process consisting of 3 consecutive phases (e.g. problem-fit, solution-fit, market-fit). See for example the PACE method or Innovation Roadmap used by ING and Rabobank. However innovation follows a non-linear patterns across social, technical and economical domains. Most organizations do not progress through these stages in a step-wise manner and allocate resources to innovation to achieve various types of fit at different phases of the product life-cycle.
Different patterns represent general strategies to commonly occurring innovation problems within a given context. We have categorized these innovation journeys in the table below. Click on each journey to learn more.
Companies that validate the problem with customers prior to any development.
These companies strictly adhere to the lean startup methodology.
Companies that start development before validation is completed.
Companies that only develop a solution once the price/and or demand for a good or service is known with some acceptable level of uncertainty.
Companies that develop a solution to acquire data more effectively than competitors to develop products or services at some future date.
Here are some of the frequent challenges encountered with different innovation journeys.
|If innovation is only seen as ...||the result can be|
|Customer-driven||Lack of technical progress leading to the inability to gain a competitive advantage.|
|Technology-driven||Producing products or services which fail to meet user needs and whose implementation may be resisted.|
|Market-driven||Lack of creative problem-solving and failing to learn from advanced users and match new technologies to user needs.|
The game board in A4 in PDF.
If you like the canvas, please share!